Sulat.com
AI models
$10 off the fastest DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3 from Synthetic
SenseNova (China) logo

Model details

GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is positioned in the GLM family as a foundation model whose most lasting contribution is the infrastructure stack built around it. According to the Z.ai research write-up for the successor release, the GLM-5.2 era produced three core tools that shaped subsequent training: IndexShare for efficient long-context processing, the SAO reinforcement-learning method designed for long-horizon tasks, and the slime framework for large-scale asynchronous training, all operating over accumulated long-horizon task environments. Because the follow-on GLM-5.3 release explicitly uses the same base model as GLM-5.2 and attributes every improvement there to post-training, GLM-5.2 should be understood primarily as the base that made later gains in coding and long-horizon reasoning possible.

For practitioners, the practical takeaway is that GLM-5.2 inherits the strengths its stack was tuned for: handling long contexts through IndexShare, sustaining extended task trajectories via SAO, and benefiting from the asynchronous scaling that slime enables. That technical lineage points to workloads where long horizons and large context windows matter more than narrow conversational polish, including multi-step software engineering, agent-style tool use, and research-style tasks that span lengthy documents. Anyone evaluating GLM-5.2 for production should weigh it as the base layer of the GLM 5.x line, with the understanding that the more conversational and coding-tuned experience will come from the post-trained successor built on top of it.

SenseNova (China)glm-5.2glm

Quick Info

Powered by
Provider
SenseNova (China)
Model key
glm-5.2
Release date
Jun 13, 2026
Last updated
Jun 13, 2026
Input modalities
Output modalities
Capabilities

Cost

A provider subscription or plan supersedes token-based pricing for this model.

Limits

Output tokens
131,072 tokens
Context window
1,000,000 tokens

Latest news about GLM-5.2

SenseNova (China)

CoverageBenchmark

Layer3 Labs published a guide, reviewed by Jonathan West and updated September 9, 2026, that separates independently verified benchmark results for GLM 5.2 from Zhipu's own reported numbers. Its strongest independent signal is GLM 5.2's #1 finish on Design Arena's Code Categories leaderboard, a blind human-preference t The guide reports Zhipu's own point scores from its technical report and model card: SWE-bench Pro at 62.1, plus Terminal-Bench 2.1 and FrontierSWE figures, noting these are directionally corroborated by the independent evaluators but have not been reproduced exactly by a third party using Zhipu's precise methodology.

SenseNova (China)

Coverage

SaferAI published an independent risk evaluation of GLM-5.2 on August 2, 2026, conducted from the public API without developer cooperation, testing Z.ai's open-weight flagship across the four systemic risk areas in the EU Code of Practice: Loss of Control, Cyber Offense, CBRN, and Harmful Manipulation. At release, GLM- This evaluation provides the first European independent assessment of GLM-5.2 and concretely calibrates its position relative to named frontier models (Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6) across capability domains directly relevant to developers and risk assessors. The finding that open-weight safeguards can be strip

SenseNova (China)

Coverage

NIST's CAISI released a formal assessment of Z.ai's GLM-5.2 on July 17, 2026, covering a model that was released as an open-weight release on June 16, 2026, with CAISI completing its evaluation on July 8. The assessment found that GLM-5.2 was probably the most capable open-weight AI model at release, with overall capab On safeguards and security, CAISI reported mixed results: GLM-5.2's safeguards permit assistance with agentic cyber exploit development and block fewer sensitive biological questions than reference U.S. models, but the model appears potentially more robust against agent hijacking and jailbreaking attacks than other eva

SenseNova (China)

Coverage

NIST's Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) published a public assessment of Z.ai's GLM-5.2 on July 17, 2026, evaluating the open-weight model released June 16, 2026. CAISI found GLM-5.2 was probably the most capable open-weight AI model at release, with overall capabilities similar to GPT-5.2 (December 2025) As a U.S. government independent evaluation, this report provides authoritative benchmark and capability data comparing GLM-5.2 directly against named frontier models (GPT-5.2, Opus 4.6), giving developers and policymakers concrete reference points for where this open-weight model sits in the capability landscape. The

SenseNova (China)

CoverageBenchmark

GLM 5.2 is a 753B-parameter mixture-of-experts model from Z.ai (the international brand of Zhipu AI, spun out of Tsinghua University) with 40B active parameters per token, a 1M-token context window via the glm-5.2[1m] variant, up to 131,072 output tokens, and an MIT license with weights on HuggingFace at zai-org/GLM-5. API pricing for GLM 5.2 is $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens, described as roughly 6x less than GPT-5.5. On coding benchmarks it leads on SWE-bench Pro and MCP-Atlas while trailing on Tool-Decathlon and FrontierSWE, and introduces IndexShare, an architectural change that cuts per-token

SenseNova (China)

CoverageBenchmark

BenchLM tracks GLM-5.2 as an open-weight reasoning model with a 1M context window, released June 16, 2026, and now superseded by Z.AI's GLM-5.3. It assigns GLM-5.2 an aggregate capability score of 68.1 out of 100, ranking it 26 of 232 models in the tracker. Coding is its strongest eligible category at rank 19, and its The page reports GLM-5.2's API pricing at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens (blended $2.90), with measured throughput of 66 tokens per second and a first-token latency of 34.33 seconds. Capability percentile breakdowns show GLM-5.2 at the 82nd percentile in Agentic, 88th in Coding, and

SenseNova (China)

CoverageBenchmark

GlmModel.com compiles 17 GLM-5.2 benchmark results across 8 models, explicitly stating all figures are results as published by the model authors and that the site does not run these evaluations. On long-horizon benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores 74.4% on FrontierSWE (tasks up to 20 hours, the top open-source model, trailing Op Comparing GLM-5.2 against GLM-5.1 shows uneven generation-over-generation gains, with sustained-execution benchmarks moving far more than single-patch ones: Terminal-Bench 2.1 +17.5 to 81.0, SWE-bench Pro +3.7 to 62.1, NL2Repo +6.2 to 48.9, DeepSWE +28.2 (2.6x) to 46.2, ProgramBench +12.8 to 63.7, MCP-Atlas +5.0 to 76.

SenseNova (China)

CoverageBenchmark

Semgrep reports that GLM-5.2 (developed by Z.ai, formerly Zhipu AI, released as an open-weight model) beat Claude Opus 4.8 on their IDOR benchmark — the same dataset and prompt they've used to evaluate frontier coding agents. Among models given nothing but a prompt, this open-weight option outperformed a leading closed This is a concrete, reproducible third-party benchmark result that places GLM-5.2 ahead of a named frontier competitor (Claude Opus 4.8) on a defined cybersecurity evaluation, providing direct evidence of its coding-agent capability. The result is practically relevant for developers and security teams evaluating open-w

Videos about GLM-5.2

More models around GLM-5.2