302.AI
Sonar published an independent evaluation of Claude Opus 5 Thinking (adaptive thinking mode) against a Claude Opus 4.8 Thinking baseline using its LLM evaluation framework on a Java benchmark of 4,441 tasks (158 HumanEval, 386 MBPP, and 3,897 ComplexCodeEval), analyzed with SonarQube. The review reports an 88.6% pass r Beyond correctness, Sonar found that comment-line density rose from 6.9% to 10.5%, cognitive complexity per kLOC fell 10%, and Opus 5 generated 2.3 times more code than Opus 4.8, while total findings rose 2.7 times and code smell and overall issue density increased. The page notes that Anthropic describes Opus 5 as del
